The Palestinian State That Was Refused During the Holocaust

7/14/2026 | Updated 7/14/2026

This is one of the least discussed moments in the entire history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — and it happened at the worst possible time in Jewish history.

The Historical Background

By the late 1930s, the British Empire was attempting to manage a deeply unstable situation in Mandatory Palestine. Jewish immigration had increased substantially throughout the decade, driven in large part by the rise of Nazi Germany and the intensifying persecution of Jews across Europe. Arab opposition to this immigration had also grown, culminating in the Arab Revolt of 1936 to 1939.

The British, caught between their commitments to both the Jewish and Arab communities, were looking for a political solution. What they produced in 1939 was one of the most consequential documents in the history of the region — and one of the least remembered.

The British White Paper of 1939

In May 1939, the British government issued the White Paper of 1939, also known as the MacDonald White Paper. It represented a dramatic shift in British policy. Among its key provisions:

  • An independent Palestinian state would be established within ten years.
  • Jewish immigration would be capped at 75,000 people over five years, after which Arab approval would be required for any further immigration.
  • Land purchases by Jews would be severely restricted.

To be direct about what this document was offering: the Arab leadership of Palestine was being handed a pathway to a fully independent state. The primary condition attached to that offer was accepting a limited and finite number of Jewish immigrants — approximately 75,000 people — over a five-year period.

It is worth pausing on that number. Seventy-five thousand people. At a moment when Jews in Europe were being systematically stripped of their rights, their property, their citizenship, and ultimately their lives.

The Mufti of Jerusalem and His Alliances

The most prominent Arab political figure in Palestine at the time was Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. He was the de facto leader of Palestinian Arab political life and held enormous religious and political authority.

Al-Husseini had fled Palestine during the Arab Revolt and by 1941 had made his way to Nazi Germany, where he met with Adolf Hitler personally. He was not a peripheral or reluctant collaborator. He actively sought the partnership. He aided Nazi recruitment efforts among Muslim populations in the Balkans, helped raise SS divisions, and publicly aligned himself with the goals of the Third Reich.

In his meeting with Hitler in November 1941 — by which point the mass murder of Jews in Eastern Europe was already underway — al-Husseini expressed his desire that Nazi Germany extend its anti-Jewish policies to the Arab world. He was not a passive bystander to the Holocaust. He was an enthusiastic participant in its ideological framework.

This is not a fringe historical claim. It is documented in German Foreign Office records, in al-Husseini's own memoirs, and in the extensive scholarship on the period.

The Rejection of a Palestinian State

Despite the significant concessions the White Paper offered to Arab interests, the Arab leadership rejected it. Al-Husseini and the Arab Higher Committee refused to accept the terms.

The stated objections centered on the continued allowance of any Jewish immigration at all. Even 75,000 people — even a capped, time-limited, politically managed number — was considered unacceptable.

To be precise about what this means historically: Arab leadership turned down an internationally backed offer of full statehood because they were unwilling to permit tens of thousands of Jewish refugees to enter the land that Jews had continuously inhabited, in various forms and numbers, for thousands of years.

The Jews being refused entry were not colonial settlers arriving to build an empire. Many of them were fleeing extermination. The years in question — 1939 onward — were the years in which the Nazi genocide was accelerating. These were not abstract immigration statistics. These were human beings with nowhere else to go.

Notably, the Jewish Agency, which represented the Jewish community in Palestine, also rejected the White Paper — but for the opposite reason. They believed it betrayed the promises made to the Jewish people and imposed unjust restrictions on immigration at the worst conceivable moment. Their objection was to the limits, not to the concept of a shared future.

What Was Happening to Jews at the Same Time

It is impossible to evaluate this rejection honestly without understanding the full context of what was happening to Jewish people during these years.

By 1939, Jews in Germany and German-occupied territories had been legally stripped of citizenship, barred from professions, subjected to mass violence during Kristallnacht in 1938, and were being forced into ghettos. By 1941 and 1942, the Final Solution was being implemented across occupied Europe. Six million Jews would be murdered by the end of the war.

Palestine — the ancient homeland of the Jewish people, a land to which Jews had maintained an unbroken historical, religious, and physical connection — was one of the places they were trying to reach. They were not arriving as strangers. They were returning, in many cases, to the only place in the world that held any meaning as home.

The refusal to permit even a limited number of these people entry, in exchange for internationally recognized statehood, is a decision that sits uncomfortably in the historical record. It does not receive the attention it deserves.

Why This Matters Today

The 1939 White Paper rejection is not simply a historical footnote. It is the first in a long series of moments in which a negotiated, internationally supported pathway to Palestinian statehood was declined — not because the terms were impossibly unfair, but because they required some form of acknowledgment of Jewish presence and Jewish rights in the land.

Understanding this history does not resolve the very real and very human suffering of Palestinian people, which is also part of this story. But it does complicate the narrative that positions Palestinian leadership as purely reactive victims of external forces. In 1939, they had a choice. They made one.

That choice was made while Jews were dying in Europe at an industrial scale, while a Palestinian Arab leader was sitting in Berlin collaborating with the architects of that genocide, and while the British were offering something that no outside power has matched since: a full, independent Palestinian state.

This is not a comfortable piece of history. But it is history, and it deserves to be known.